Amazon and Netflix are being sued for US$1 million-plus by a former employee of both companies over allegations of wrongful dismissal.
Jerry Kowal, who was director of content acquisitions at Netflix before joining Amazon’s Digital Video team, alleges Netflix used its position as a key Amazon customer (Netflix uses Amazon cloud storage services) to get him fired from his new role.
Kowal is suing for defamation, false light invasion of privacy, civil conspiracy, intentional interference of employment relationship, blacklisting and wrongful termination at a Californian Superior Court.
Kowal, who as Netflix’s content acquisitions director was responsible for buying television programming for territories such as Canada, said the case was a “David vs Goliath” battle.
Among his claims, Kowal alleges that after a year working in Netflix’s “cutthroat” work environment, he was offered a job at Amazon, which he accepted and subsequently began in June 2013.
Netflix did “everything it could to dissuade him” to leave but was unsuccessful. Kowal claims the streaming service then claimed Kowal stored and disclosed confidential information, before blacklisting him and prohibiting its employees from communicating with their former colleague.
Furthermore, Kowal alleges Netflix attempted to ruin his reputation, and leveraged its relationship with Amazon to ensure he was later fired.
Kowal’s filing said he was placed on mandatory leave at Amazon while the claims against him were investigated, including having his personal computer devices turned over for forensic analysis on the advice on counsel.
He alleges these searches turned up no evidence of wrongdoing, and was told by Amazon to meet with Harry Korrell, a partner at an Amazon-affiliated law firm, who ensured him the situation would “all blow over”.
He claims Amazon then agreed Korrell would represent both the business and Kowal in any proceeding litigation, but this was cancelled a short time later and Kowal was then subsequently fired.
Netflix nor Amazon could be contacted at press time, but the Hollywood Reporter quoted a Netflix rep saying the company did not comment on pending litigation.
“The main difference now is that the step you need to take to get access to illegal content is as small as a… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
21st April 2019